Cella, D.; Yount, S.; Rothrock, N.; Gershon, R.; Cook, K.; Reeve, B.; Ader, D.; Fries, J.F. % The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) [32] which is criticized due to it development methodology using a specific workers population in a small data set with a high average age [6, 8]. Distribution and normality were determined by one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests (significance >0.05). The regulation of Patient-Reported Outcome claims: need for a flexible standard. Reliability for the UEFI-20 and UEFI-15 was the same (ICC=0.94 for both measures). Conclusions: 0000157982 00000 n The demographic and frequency of diagnosis of the study sample are detailed in Table1. The exclusion criteria were age <18years and poor Spanish language comprehension as required for the completion of the questionnaires. 0000078184 00000 n A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) into Brazilian Portuguese in patients with chronic upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Ethical clearance was approved by the Tribunal of Review of Human Subjects at the University of Malaga. pp. Available online: LeBlanc, M.; Stineman, M.; DeMichele, A.; Stricker, C.; Mao, J.J. Validation of QuickDASH Outcome Measure in Breast Cancer Survivors for Upper Extremity Disability. Les valeurs de la pDMCI s'tablissaient 8/80 pour le questionnaire IFMS-20 et 6,7/100 pour le questionnaire IFMS-15; la pDMCI tait plus leve chez les personnes dont le bras non dominant tait atteint. The QuickDASH-Sp had greater than >30% of missing responses affecting 41 of the 126 respondent questionnaires. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. Terwee, C.B. The present study included 216 BCS, and the same sample was used for all analyses. Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. There are also a significant number of joint and condition specific scales but these cannot be used regionally as they do not consider the upper limb as a single kinetic chain [8, 18]. 2023 Mar 21;11(6):912. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060912. This assists the clinicians understanding of the effects of a condition or disease on a patients capabilities, functioning and symptoms [4]. The Upper Limb Functional Index: Development and Determination of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness. GQAzTeJQwe$Eu/A$J#m@ F6& &mb,YHdN{%E,K+(S msNZ}HbJbz >wUA[@=%8wjJaM ; Abrams, G.; Mastick, J.; et al. 0000088903 00000 n Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Upper Extremity Functional Index-15 (UEFI-15) - Mapi Research Trust J Hand Ther 2010,23(1):4152. Med Clin (Barc) 2006,127(12):441447. ; Bartlett, M.S. Psychometrika 1951, 16: 297334. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the The test-retest reliability or reproducibility was also high with the values (0.92 to 0.95) in-line with those found for the original instrument (0.90 to 0.96) [8]. ; Roldn-Jimnez, C. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor. 0000091146 00000 n In the same study, the longitudinal validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.74. The KaiserMeyerOklin test determined the correlation matrix (0.889) for the ULFI-Sp in female BCS and the Bartletts Test of Sphericity (chi-squared value = 2087.167 and df 300, The ULFI-Sp showed a high degree consistency, as illustrated by the high Cronbach value ( = 0.916) with an individual item range between 0.868 and 0.875. 0000122698 00000 n Jay, M.; Creelman, B.; Baliski, C. Patient Reported Outcomes Associated with Surgical Intervention for Breast Cancer. -, McPhail SM, Bagraith KS, Schippers M, Wells PJ, Hatton A. 0000158978 00000 n Scoring and interpretation of scores Internal consistency of the scale items was determined from Cronbach's coefficients as calculated at an anticipated value range of 0.80-0.95 [20, 45]. 0000155635 00000 n PubMed }Z:d2]l@sS$2fQBQE&0bNJ-%+(5s6`[RbP=u[[bl=. BMJ. To examine the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the 20-item version and the Rasch-refined 15-item version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI-20 and UEFI-15, respectively) and to determine the impact of arm dominance on the positive minimal clinically important difference (pMCID). A two stage . Today, do you or would you have any difficulty at all with: Today, do you or would you have any difficulty at all with: Upper Extremity Functional Scale . 0000097773 00000 n Am J Occup Ther 2011,65(2):169178. J Hand Ther 2010,23(1):3139. 2023; 20(6):4997. The study was carried out following the ethical research principles of the Helsinki Declaration of 1964. 0000076125 00000 n Item scores range from 0 to 4, 0 indicates extreme difficulty while 4 indicates no difficulty with a task and the total score is a total of the item scores. Below are the links to the authors original submitted files for images. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group during Its First Two Years. 2023 Jan 16;23(2):1012. doi: 10.3390/s23021012. 0000158338 00000 n 0000076521 00000 n eCollection 2023 Jan. Phys Ther. 0000083850 00000 n 0000076943 00000 n BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010, 10: 161. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. 0000158831 00000 n The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). The Oxford Shoulder Score Revisited. California Privacy Statement, The strengths of the study include the prospective nature adequate number of subjects, the inclusion of consecutive patients and the limited selection bias [24, 32]. Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI. Rasch-Validated Version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index for The UEFI is able to distinguish improved patients from stable patients (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.94) with a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specicity of 0.92, and https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064997, Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals, You can make submissions to other journals. (PDF) Upper Extremity Functional Index - ResearchGate Global ratings of change (GRC) were provided by the treating physiotherapist and patient at Time 3. PDF Upper extremity functional scale - Transport Accident Commission This comparative analysis in separate studies has provided scope to suggest the ULFI was preferred to the criterion tools of the DASH [6, 17, 38], UEFS [6] and QuickDASH [7, 26] due to a combination of enhanced psychometric and practical characteristics. The 15-item Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI-15) hierarchical structure, depicting the arrangement of the UEFI-15 on an interval-level measure of upper extremity function as captured by the UEFI-15. https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess. Edit your upper extremity functional index online. 0000070344 00000 n Methods: A two stage observational study was conducted. Gabel, C.P. The questionnaire reliability was high ( = 0.93). 2019). Nesvold, I.-L.; Foss, S.D. Bejer A, Bie A, Kyc S, Lorenc M, Mataczyski P, Domka-Jopek E, Melloh M, Gabel CP. 0000072370 00000 n Martnez-Cal J, Molina-Torres G, Carrasco-Vega E, Barni L, Ventura-Miranda MI, Gonzalez-Sanchez M. Healthcare (Basel). The criterion validity demonstrated only a fair degree of differential association with the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L-VAS. In a study by Chesworth et al[4], reliability for the UEFI-20 and UEFI-15 was the same (ICC=0.94 for both measures). 10.2106/JBJS.J.01744. ; Spalek, R.; Ferriero, G. Cross-cultural adaptation, and validity of the italian version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI-I). The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. ; Kim, S.-W.; Heo, C.-Y. Med Care. 476 0 obj <>stream Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Oct 26;93(5):e2022307. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index. Liebenson, C. (2007). In a study by Stratford et al[1], comparing Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI 20- item) and the Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS), the discriminant cross-sectional validity of the UEFI was found to be 6.65 with p = .003 while the convergent cross-sectional validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.82. 0000153714 00000 n The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). Criterion validity with the EQ-5D-3L was fair and inversely correlated (r=0.59). Cross-sectional convergent validity was determined by the association (Pearson's r) between Time 1 measures of function and pain. 2014 Jun 27;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-96. There are currently two versions of the upper extremity functional index; UEFI 20-item and UEFI 15-item. Predictors of Altered Upper Extremity Function During the First Year After Breast Cancer Treatment. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand - Shirley Ryan AbilityLab ; Jnsson, C.; Olsson, A.C.; Gard, G.; Johansson, K. Womens Experience of Physical Activity Following Breast Cancer Treatment. most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal. The UEFI-15 is recommended because it measures only one dimension: UE function. x]#+1vD7,1=r5^XJS/~`lc EY"/{pIQ$Da;U^Y|QTVMWM]_+^U>w?)Qn+W U>zM[ r^Of] DUU,#vasW8`5Z9wvU7]]Uir_ 7%[ucqsnWcyUN&w6 z56}=+J'[7*teJNP#k$ o{}_7N,qir/\Z,o~/wBrp+'M$ F,U/tkZzE x/x =_R&V${1_7E] ulv.Q\#g+xf, ,fVcUf17pfW{,:oWx?\:U/ ; Michener, L.A.; Melloh, M.; Burkett, B. WHO | Breast Cancer: Prevention and Control. Though various region specific PROs have been used to assess upper-limb functional status, it is accepted that there is no gold standard [8, 1012]. Upper Limb Disorders (ULDs) are highly prevalent even years after a diagnosis. The Spanish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has excellent psychometric properties for reliability and validity [. The present study has several limitations. These regional PRO measures are argued to provide greater sensitivity and improved representation of the individuals functional status than joint or condition specific measures [79]. A questionnaire must provide a single-factor structure so that it can be summated to provide a single or summary score. 10.1097/00043764-199712000-00014, Sambandam SN, Priyanka PAG, Ilango B: Critical analysis of outcome measures used in the assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Binkley JM, Stratford P, Kirkpatrick S, Farley CR, Okoli J, Gabram S. Clin Breast Cancer. In most cases Physiopedia articles are a secondary source and so should not be used as references. 0000072523 00000 n 0000155264 00000 n The questionnaire lists 20 activities and the patient gives a score to each based on the difficulty they have completing that activity. future research directions and describes possible research applications. Aytar A, Yuruk ZO, Tuzun EH, Baltaci G, Karatas M, Eker L. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. Reliability was performed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients Type 2,1 (ICC2.1) test-retest methodology in a randomly selected subgroup of the full sample (n=35, 4662years, 61.1% female). The QuickDASH was unavailable due to excessive completion errors. 10.1016/j.math.2008.01.013, Franchignoni F, Ferriero G, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Brigatti E: Psychometric properties of QuickDASH - A classical test theory and Rasch analysis study. 0000155497 00000 n The cross-cultural adaptation of the ULFI into Spanish enables clinicians in Spanish speaking settings to compare outcomes following their treatments and interventions affecting the upper limb. FOIA Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Canc De Groef, A.; Meeus, M.; De Vrieze, T.; Vos, L.; Van Kampen, M.; Christiaens, M.-R.; Neven, P.; Geraerts, I.; Devoogdt, N. Pain Characteristics as Important Contributing Factors to Upper Limb Dysfunctions in Breast Cancer Survivors at Long Term. The ULFI-Sp is a valid upper limb outcome measure with similar psychometric properties to the English language version.
Arthur Miller First Piece Of Writing That Garnered Attention,
Ano Ang Mga Bumubuo Sa Sektor Ng Agrikultura,
Lampasas Police Blotter,
Pig Farmers In The Bible,
Articles U
